TasksBoard Kanban vs Scrum
Kanban en Scrum gebruiken beide visuele borden, maar ze werken heel anders. Deze gids legt de belangrijkste verschillen uit, zodat je de juiste aanpak kunt kiezen en vandaag nog aan de slag kunt.
Gebruikt door 2M+ mensen. Gratis om te beginnen.
| Feature | Kanban | Scrum |
|---|---|---|
| Vaste iteraties (sprints) Fixed iterations (sprints) | Optioneel | |
| WIP-limieten WIP limits | ||
| Gedefinieerde rollen (Scrum Master, PO) Defined roles (Scrum Master, PO) | ||
| Ceremonies voor backlog-beheer Backlog grooming ceremonies | ||
| Continue levering Continuous delivery | Tussen sprints | |
| Flow-statistieken (cyclustijd, doorvoer) Flow metrics (cycle time, throughput) | ||
| Velocity-tracking Velocity tracking | ||
| Bordaanpassing Board customization | Alleen sprintkolommen | |
| Werkt voor ondersteuning / operatieteams Works for support / ops teams | ||
| Werkt voor product feature dev Works for product feature dev |
Kanban optimizes flow; Scrum optimizes predictable delivery. Compare each practice with screenshots and sourced references.
Kanban has no required sprint cadence. Work flows continuously through columns as capacity allows.
Scrum organizes work into time-boxed Sprints, typically 1–4 weeks, with a committed Sprint Goal.
It's a tie
Neither is universally better — Kanban suits continuous flow; Scrum suits time-boxed, predictable delivery.
Kanban uses Work-In-Progress limits per column to prevent overload and surface bottlenecks.
Scrum limits work indirectly through Sprint capacity planning rather than per-column WIP caps.
Winner: Kanban
Explicit per-column WIP limits are a core Kanban practice for preventing overload and surfacing bottlenecks.
Sources
Kanban has no mandated roles. The team owns the board and pull-based workflow.
Scrum defines Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Developers with distinct accountabilities.
It's a tie
Kanban needs no fixed roles; Scrum's defined accountabilities help larger teams that want clear structure.
Kanban refines work just-in-time as items approach the top of the backlog column.
Scrum holds regular backlog refinement sessions to prepare items for upcoming Sprints.
It's a tie
Kanban refines just-in-time; Scrum schedules backlog refinement ceremonies — both work, different rhythms.
Sources
Kanban teams release whenever an item is done — no waiting for a sprint boundary.
Scrum typically delivers at the end of each Sprint during the Sprint Review.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban teams ship whenever an item is done; Scrum typically batches delivery at the Sprint Review.
Sources
Kanban tracks cycle time, throughput, and lead time to optimize flow efficiency.
Scrum primarily measures velocity — story points completed per Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Cycle time, throughput, and lead time give Kanban teams direct flow-efficiency signals.
Sources
Kanban does not use velocity. Flow metrics replace point-based tracking.
Scrum teams track velocity to forecast Sprint capacity and release planning.
Winner: Scrum
Story-point velocity is Scrum's primary forecasting tool — Kanban deliberately avoids velocity tracking.
Kanban boards are fully customizable — add columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Scrum boards follow a standard To Do → In Progress → Done pattern tied to Sprint scope.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban boards are fully customizable — columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Sources
Kanban excels for interrupt-driven work — support tickets, incidents, and ops queues flow continuously.
Scrum's sprint commitment model fits poorly when urgent items arrive mid-Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Interrupt-driven support and ops queues flow continuously on Kanban; Scrum's sprint commitment fights mid-sprint urgency.
Sources
Kanban works for feature dev when continuous flow is preferred over batch planning.
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable increments.
Winner: Scrum
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable sprint increments.
4.8 / 5 uit 1.000+ beoordelingen in de Chrome Web Store
"Always have 101 things to do and this helps me organize and prioritize like no other app can. It syncs to my phone and laptop, and when I add dates to tasks, they automatically integrate into my Google Calendar, which is immensely convenient. I can look at my daily, weekly, and monthly overview in Google Calendar and clearly see how much I was able to accomplish! Great tool indeed. Excited to see how it will evolve over time."
"Seriously, makes my tasks easier to share with the team, and the free version is quite nice for our little office. Eventually, we will expand, and this is definitely a great tool to do that! Syncs with my Workspace and Calendar."
"I love the simple, intuitive interface and the Add to Tasks feature, especially as I work through my emails! Sharing my tasks is also easy. Overall, outstanding and simple to use, and that means a lot with too many complex tasks out there!"
"Great too for managing daily routine and plan tasks. Would be perfect if it was updated for generating reports for statistics. For google tasks and google calendar"
Scrum gebruikt sprints van vaste lengte met gedefinieerde rollen en ceremonies. Kanban gebruikt een continu flow-model zonder verplichte sprints. Scrum is gestructureerder; Kanban is flexibeler.
Ja. "Scrumban" is een hybride aanpak waarbij teams Scrum-ceremonies gebruiken, maar de workflow beheren met een Kanban bord en WIP-limieten. Het komt veel voor bij teams die sprintvoorspelbaarheid willen naast flow-zichtbaarheid.
Kanban is over het algemeen eenvoudiger voor kleine teams omdat het geen verplichte rollen of ceremonies heeft. Een team van twee tot vijf personen kan direct een Kanban bord starten zonder training. Scrum-overhead is moeilijker te rechtvaardigen onder de vijf personen.
Kanban vereist geen story points. In plaats daarvan gebruikt het flow-statistieken: cyclustijd (hoe lang een taak duurt om te voltooien), doorvoer (hoeveel taken per week worden voltooid) en doorlooptijd. Deze statistieken zijn vaak actiegerichter dan velocity.
Ja. TasksBoard geeft je een schermvullend Kanban bord ondersteund door Google Tasks. Je kunt kolommen maken voor elke workflow (Te doen, In uitvoering, Klaar of aangepaste fasen), taken tussen kolommen slepen en deadlines toevoegen die synchroniseren met Google Calendar.
Kanban heeft geen vereiste rollen. In tegenstelling tot Scrum is er geen Scrum Master of Product Owner verplicht door de methode. Teams wijzen vaak een flow-manager of service delivery manager aan, maar deze rollen zijn optioneel en informeel.
Scrum was oorspronkelijk ontworpen voor softwareontwikkeling, maar marketing-, HR- en operatieteams hebben het met succes aangepast. Kanban past zich nog gemakkelijker aan niet-software workflows aan omdat het minder beperkingen oplegt.
Ga aan de slag
Meld je aan met je Google-account en bouw in enkele minuten een visuele workflow. Sleep taken tussen kolommen, stel deadlines in en deel borden met je team.
Geen creditcard vereist. Werkt met je bestaande Google Tasks.
