TasksBoard Kanban vs Scrum
Tanto Kanban como Scrum utilizan tableros visuales, pero funcionan de manera muy diferente. Esta guía desglosa las diferencias clave para que puedas elegir el enfoque correcto y comenzar a entregar trabajo hoy mismo.
Utilizado por más de 2 millones de personas. Gratis para empezar.
| Feature | Kanban | Scrum |
|---|---|---|
| Iteraciones fijas (sprints) Fixed iterations (sprints) | Opcional | |
| Límites de WIP WIP limits | ||
| Roles definidos (Scrum Master, PO) Defined roles (Scrum Master, PO) | ||
| Ceremonias de preparación del backlog Backlog grooming ceremonies | ||
| Entrega continua Continuous delivery | Entre sprints | |
| Métricas de flujo (tiempo de ciclo, rendimiento) Flow metrics (cycle time, throughput) | ||
| Seguimiento de velocidad Velocity tracking | ||
| Personalización del tablero Board customization | Solo columnas de sprint | |
| Funciona para equipos de soporte / operaciones Works for support / ops teams | ||
| Funciona para desarrollo de funciones de producto Works for product feature dev |
Kanban optimizes flow; Scrum optimizes predictable delivery. Compare each practice with screenshots and sourced references.
Kanban has no required sprint cadence. Work flows continuously through columns as capacity allows.
Scrum organizes work into time-boxed Sprints, typically 1–4 weeks, with a committed Sprint Goal.
It's a tie
Neither is universally better — Kanban suits continuous flow; Scrum suits time-boxed, predictable delivery.
Kanban uses Work-In-Progress limits per column to prevent overload and surface bottlenecks.
Scrum limits work indirectly through Sprint capacity planning rather than per-column WIP caps.
Winner: Kanban
Explicit per-column WIP limits are a core Kanban practice for preventing overload and surfacing bottlenecks.
Sources
Kanban has no mandated roles. The team owns the board and pull-based workflow.
Scrum defines Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Developers with distinct accountabilities.
It's a tie
Kanban needs no fixed roles; Scrum's defined accountabilities help larger teams that want clear structure.
Kanban refines work just-in-time as items approach the top of the backlog column.
Scrum holds regular backlog refinement sessions to prepare items for upcoming Sprints.
It's a tie
Kanban refines just-in-time; Scrum schedules backlog refinement ceremonies — both work, different rhythms.
Sources
Kanban teams release whenever an item is done — no waiting for a sprint boundary.
Scrum typically delivers at the end of each Sprint during the Sprint Review.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban teams ship whenever an item is done; Scrum typically batches delivery at the Sprint Review.
Sources
Kanban tracks cycle time, throughput, and lead time to optimize flow efficiency.
Scrum primarily measures velocity — story points completed per Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Cycle time, throughput, and lead time give Kanban teams direct flow-efficiency signals.
Sources
Kanban does not use velocity. Flow metrics replace point-based tracking.
Scrum teams track velocity to forecast Sprint capacity and release planning.
Winner: Scrum
Story-point velocity is Scrum's primary forecasting tool — Kanban deliberately avoids velocity tracking.
Kanban boards are fully customizable — add columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Scrum boards follow a standard To Do → In Progress → Done pattern tied to Sprint scope.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban boards are fully customizable — columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Sources
Kanban excels for interrupt-driven work — support tickets, incidents, and ops queues flow continuously.
Scrum's sprint commitment model fits poorly when urgent items arrive mid-Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Interrupt-driven support and ops queues flow continuously on Kanban; Scrum's sprint commitment fights mid-sprint urgency.
Sources
Kanban works for feature dev when continuous flow is preferred over batch planning.
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable increments.
Winner: Scrum
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable sprint increments.
4.8 / 5 de más de 1,000 reseñas en Chrome Web Store
"Always have 101 things to do and this helps me organize and prioritize like no other app can. It syncs to my phone and laptop, and when I add dates to tasks, they automatically integrate into my Google Calendar, which is immensely convenient. I can look at my daily, weekly, and monthly overview in Google Calendar and clearly see how much I was able to accomplish! Great tool indeed. Excited to see how it will evolve over time."
"Seriously, makes my tasks easier to share with the team, and the free version is quite nice for our little office. Eventually, we will expand, and this is definitely a great tool to do that! Syncs with my Workspace and Calendar."
"I love the simple, intuitive interface and the Add to Tasks feature, especially as I work through my emails! Sharing my tasks is also easy. Overall, outstanding and simple to use, and that means a lot with too many complex tasks out there!"
"Great too for managing daily routine and plan tasks. Would be perfect if it was updated for generating reports for statistics. For google tasks and google calendar"
Scrum utiliza sprints de longitud fija con roles y ceremonias definidos. Kanban utiliza un modelo de flujo continuo sin sprints obligatorios. Scrum es más estructurado; Kanban es más flexible.
Sí. "Scrumban" es un enfoque híbrido donde los equipos utilizan ceremonias Scrum pero gestionan el flujo de trabajo con un tablero Kanban y límites de WIP. Es común en equipos que desean previsibilidad de sprint junto con visibilidad de flujo.
Kanban es generalmente más sencillo para equipos pequeños porque no tiene roles ni ceremonias obligatorias. Un equipo de dos a cinco personas puede iniciar un tablero Kanban de inmediato sin formación. La sobrecarga de Scrum es más difícil de justificar por debajo de unas cinco personas.
Kanban no requiere puntos de historia. En su lugar, utiliza métricas de flujo: tiempo de ciclo (cuánto tarda en completarse una tarea), rendimiento (cuántas tareas se completan por semana) y tiempo de entrega. Estas métricas suelen ser más accionables que la velocidad.
Sí. TasksBoard te ofrece un tablero Kanban a pantalla completa respaldado por Google Tasks. Puedes crear columnas para cualquier flujo de trabajo (Por hacer, En curso, Terminado o etapas personalizadas), arrastrar tareas entre ellas y añadir fechas de entrega que se sincronizan con Google Calendar.
Kanban no tiene roles obligatorios. A diferencia de Scrum, no hay un Scrum Master o Product Owner exigido por el método. Los equipos a menudo designan un gestor de flujo o un gestor de entrega de servicios, pero estos roles son opcionales e informales.
Scrum fue diseñado originalmente para el desarrollo de software, pero los equipos de marketing, recursos humanos y operaciones lo han adaptado con éxito. Kanban se adapta aún más fácilmente a los flujos de trabajo que no son de software porque impone menos restricciones.
Comenzar
Inicia sesión con tu cuenta de Google y crea un flujo de trabajo visual en minutos. Arrastra tareas a través de columnas, establece fechas de entrega y comparte tableros con tu equipo.
No se requiere tarjeta de crédito. Funciona con tus Google Tasks existentes.
