TasksBoard Kanban vs Scrum
Kanban e Scrum usam quadros visuais, mas funcionam de maneiras muito diferentes. Este guia detalha as principais diferenças para que você possa escolher a abordagem certa e começar a entregar trabalho hoje.
Usado por mais de 2 milhões de pessoas. Comece gratuitamente.
| Feature | Kanban | Scrum |
|---|---|---|
| Iterações fixas (sprints) Fixed iterations (sprints) | Opcional | |
| Limites de WIP WIP limits | ||
| Papéis definidos (Scrum Master, PO) Defined roles (Scrum Master, PO) | ||
| Cerimônias de refinamento de backlog Backlog grooming ceremonies | ||
| Entrega contínua Continuous delivery | Entre sprints | |
| Métricas de fluxo (tempo de ciclo, throughput) Flow metrics (cycle time, throughput) | ||
| Rastreamento de velocidade Velocity tracking | ||
| Personalização do quadro Board customization | Apenas colunas de sprint | |
| Funciona para equipes de suporte / ops Works for support / ops teams | ||
| Funciona para desenvolvimento de recursos de produto Works for product feature dev |
Kanban optimizes flow; Scrum optimizes predictable delivery. Compare each practice with screenshots and sourced references.
Kanban has no required sprint cadence. Work flows continuously through columns as capacity allows.
Scrum organizes work into time-boxed Sprints, typically 1–4 weeks, with a committed Sprint Goal.
It's a tie
Neither is universally better — Kanban suits continuous flow; Scrum suits time-boxed, predictable delivery.
Kanban uses Work-In-Progress limits per column to prevent overload and surface bottlenecks.
Scrum limits work indirectly through Sprint capacity planning rather than per-column WIP caps.
Winner: Kanban
Explicit per-column WIP limits are a core Kanban practice for preventing overload and surfacing bottlenecks.
Sources
Kanban has no mandated roles. The team owns the board and pull-based workflow.
Scrum defines Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Developers with distinct accountabilities.
It's a tie
Kanban needs no fixed roles; Scrum's defined accountabilities help larger teams that want clear structure.
Kanban refines work just-in-time as items approach the top of the backlog column.
Scrum holds regular backlog refinement sessions to prepare items for upcoming Sprints.
It's a tie
Kanban refines just-in-time; Scrum schedules backlog refinement ceremonies — both work, different rhythms.
Sources
Kanban teams release whenever an item is done — no waiting for a sprint boundary.
Scrum typically delivers at the end of each Sprint during the Sprint Review.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban teams ship whenever an item is done; Scrum typically batches delivery at the Sprint Review.
Sources
Kanban tracks cycle time, throughput, and lead time to optimize flow efficiency.
Scrum primarily measures velocity — story points completed per Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Cycle time, throughput, and lead time give Kanban teams direct flow-efficiency signals.
Sources
Kanban does not use velocity. Flow metrics replace point-based tracking.
Scrum teams track velocity to forecast Sprint capacity and release planning.
Winner: Scrum
Story-point velocity is Scrum's primary forecasting tool — Kanban deliberately avoids velocity tracking.
Kanban boards are fully customizable — add columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Scrum boards follow a standard To Do → In Progress → Done pattern tied to Sprint scope.
Winner: Kanban
Kanban boards are fully customizable — columns, swim lanes, and WIP limits per team.
Sources
Kanban excels for interrupt-driven work — support tickets, incidents, and ops queues flow continuously.
Scrum's sprint commitment model fits poorly when urgent items arrive mid-Sprint.
Winner: Kanban
Interrupt-driven support and ops queues flow continuously on Kanban; Scrum's sprint commitment fights mid-sprint urgency.
Sources
Kanban works for feature dev when continuous flow is preferred over batch planning.
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable increments.
Winner: Scrum
Scrum is widely adopted for product teams building features in predictable sprint increments.
4.8 / 5 de mais de 1.000 avaliações na Chrome Web Store
"Always have 101 things to do and this helps me organize and prioritize like no other app can. It syncs to my phone and laptop, and when I add dates to tasks, they automatically integrate into my Google Calendar, which is immensely convenient. I can look at my daily, weekly, and monthly overview in Google Calendar and clearly see how much I was able to accomplish! Great tool indeed. Excited to see how it will evolve over time."
"Seriously, makes my tasks easier to share with the team, and the free version is quite nice for our little office. Eventually, we will expand, and this is definitely a great tool to do that! Syncs with my Workspace and Calendar."
"I love the simple, intuitive interface and the Add to Tasks feature, especially as I work through my emails! Sharing my tasks is also easy. Overall, outstanding and simple to use, and that means a lot with too many complex tasks out there!"
"Great too for managing daily routine and plan tasks. Would be perfect if it was updated for generating reports for statistics. For google tasks and google calendar"
O Scrum usa sprints de duração fixa com papéis e cerimônias definidos. O Kanban usa um modelo de fluxo contínuo sem sprints obrigatórios. O Scrum é mais estruturado; o Kanban é mais flexível.
Sim. "Scrumban" é uma abordagem híbrida onde as equipes usam cerimônias Scrum, mas gerenciam o fluxo de trabalho com um quadro Kanban e limites de WIP. É comum em equipes que desejam previsibilidade de sprint junto com visibilidade de fluxo.
O Kanban é geralmente mais simples para equipes pequenas porque não possui papéis ou cerimônias obrigatórias. Uma equipe de duas a cinco pessoas pode iniciar um quadro Kanban imediatamente sem treinamento. A sobrecarga do Scrum é mais difícil de justificar para menos de cinco pessoas.
O Kanban não exige pontos de história. Em vez disso, ele usa métricas de fluxo: tempo de ciclo (quanto tempo uma tarefa leva para ser concluída), throughput (quantas tarefas são concluídas por semana) e lead time. Essas métricas são frequentemente mais acionáveis do que a velocidade.
Sim. O TasksBoard oferece um quadro Kanban em tela cheia integrado ao Google Tasks. Você pode criar colunas para qualquer fluxo de trabalho (A Fazer, Em Progresso, Concluído ou etapas personalizadas), arrastar tarefas entre elas e adicionar datas de entrega que sincronizam com o Google Calendar.
O Kanban não tem papéis obrigatórios. Ao contrário do Scrum, não há Scrum Master ou Product Owner exigidos pelo método. As equipes geralmente designam um gerente de fluxo ou gerente de entrega de serviço, mas esses papéis são opcionais e informais.
O Scrum foi originalmente projetado para desenvolvimento de software, mas equipes de marketing, RH e operações adaptaram-no com sucesso. O Kanban adapta-se ainda mais facilmente a fluxos de trabalho que não são de software porque impõe menos restrições.
Comece agora
Faça login com sua conta Google e crie um fluxo de trabalho visual em minutos. Arraste tarefas entre colunas, defina datas de entrega e compartilhe quadros com sua equipe.
Não é necessário cartão de crédito. Funciona com seu Google Tasks existente.
